#32. THE DECEPTION OF LIBERTY
To the reader,
Please go to "older posts" and begin with
#1. EVEPLEBEODIOUS, then sequentially with #2., #3., etc.
#32. THE DECEPTION OF LIBERTY
GIVE TO US YOUR LIBERTY;
WE WILL GIVE HER DEATH!
USS LIBERTY / 1967
Sadly, she shall not ever rest in peace.
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?
How is it, the inhabitants of;
"the land of the free and home of the brave" allow themselves to be so disrespected and trodden upon, especially when part of their creed is:
"DON'T TREAD ON ME"?
Is it because "they" are truly weak and subservient in nature and really live in:
"the land of the fee
and
the home of the slave"?
One could argue this endlessly,
but the evidence of the weak and subservient is
too overwhelming to deny!
How is it that these same peoples don't seem
to have enough gumption, to collectively
speak out and "stop" their governments
obvious breeches of moral ineptitude's and
outright egregious and unlawful activities?
What in the hell am I talking about,
you may ask?
I wish to speak to:
The demise by treason of:
"The USS LIBERTY"
BY: sitting president
"Lyndon B. Johnson";
in collusion with "Israel"
If you don't believe this;
Go to Google!
If you then believe, "you" will ask;
How come I never knew this and
"why"
hasn't anything been done about it?
The next question "you" might want to ask is;
what else do I "not know about" and
then I must now warn you, that you better
put your seat belt on, cause your going on a
very bumpy, aggravating and
"piss you off" ride.
DECEPTION - the act of deceiving;
the state of "being deceived"
something done by somebody(s) that is intended to deceive;
fraud, artifice
DECEIVE - to mislead by a false appearance or statement(s)
delude; to mislead or falsely persuade others.
FOOLS - the deceived
Though the treasonous act against
The USS LIBERTY is great,
it does not nearly compare with
the treason that was wrought on "91101"
Watch for:
............THE INDICTMENT...........
"WOLVES FROM THE SHEEP"
coming soon!
Do "you" have your seat belt on?
I am FranCisco d Nostromo
I have spoken
I will speak again.
It's your turn now!
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
#31. MONSTERS FEAST & CANTARRA
To the reader, please go to "older posts" and begin with
#1. EVEPLEBEODIOUS. then sequentially #2., #3., etc.
#31. MONSTERS FEAST & CANTARRA
The states now receive huge sums of revenue from tax on
cigarettes, cigars, chew, smokeless tobacco, liquor, wine and beer.
Now is an understatement!
They, the states governments have been gleaning billions of dollars from
these taxes and stuffing this cash into their many bottomless pit pockets for
over 70 years!
If this is not enough, which it apparently isn't, now these
same states that have sucked the blood of the people through
and by this tax mechanism, are now attempting, and in some
cases have already been quite successful, in suing the tobacco industry
for a bigger slice of this bitter sweet money pie;
while I might add they still continue to receive the tax on
these "alleged killers"!
The question might be asked; just what do "they", the states,
do with this money?
Did "they" use this tax windfall to produce:
anti-smoking advertisements and educational forums?
I don't think so.
It seems the anti-smoking advertisements and educational
productions began "after " they " the states started winning
the suits against "their sugar daddy" tobacco companies!
In either aspect it all appears a little HYPOCRITICAL.
Maybe it's just me and my mis-understanding.
The states main claim against the tobacco industry is:
HEALTH CARE COSTS.
The states say , they have to "cough up" (no pun intended) the
payment for lung cancer and related illness born through
smoking and chewing tobacco products.
Please don't get me wrong; I AM NOT PRO-TOBACCO!
Although I know smoking tobacco products is absolutely a killer;
it is not the tobacco at fault, it is those who smoke and those
who support, promote and ALL who profit from tobacco.
Of course we all know it is "tobacco companies",
"their share holders" and "their employees" who reap
the most profit and thus should also be awarded special fault;
and yes of course because of any deception, the
special awards should be squared.
Let us not forget the health care industry in general!
Oops I amolst forgot; The Mortuaries and the Cemetaries!
As it is said, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that
applying heat to something designed to cool will ultimately cause
failure to some degree. Now add many destructive chemicals to
the mix and what do you get; total failure.
It just seems to be, on the part of the states, such a great farce!
How can the states justify their actions?
Shouldn't the states, since they have a share in the profits,
also claim
"their share" of the responsibility and the guilt?
But NO; instead the states claim "they" have been fouled!
Imagine that!
Also, these same states are trying to limit the amount of monies
to those who have been adversely affected through either
illicit or improper activities such as, fraud or malpractice.
The "Frivolous Law Suit" controversy is a hot topic these days
with many Law makers and Lobbyists.
Those who have been or might become injured by corporations,
doctors, hospitals and the like, are being told:
If you are injured, even if those that harmed you,
the defendants; get the asses severely kicked in court;
We, "the states" shall determine the "cap limit" you
may be awarded and that's that; and
even if you lost both of your arms because of your
"unfortunate experience" because of a faulty product
the answer is:
NO; "WE" won't come and help you wipe your ass and
Oh by the way, you just bought a pack of cigarettes,
thanks for paying your our tax!
"OUR" social system has become quite beastly;
no matter how many "time outs" we take.
Those that terribly injure others will have to pay a
minimal responsibility tab for "their so called errors",
no matter how much suffering those who were injured
shall have to endure!
Who stands to gain most from a system operated in this fashion?
Now switching tracks but still the same destination.
Northern California, July 14th, 1991 / You might recall;
Southern Pacific Railroad dropped a tanker car full to brim,
with 19,000 gallons of a bio-cide called
Metam Sodium (Vapam),
into an uppermost part of The Upper Sacramento River,
at a loop bridge called Cantarra;
consequently killing 45 miles of the river.
Everything in the river, plant or animal died. The plant life along
the river and the animal life that drank from the river died;
birds, bears, deer, squirrels, etc, died.
Even insects and earthworms died and disappeared as a result of
the huge cloud of toxic fumes created from the
8 gallons of water /1 gallon of chemical (poison) mix ratio.
Lets do the math: 8 x 19,000=152,000
That's 152,000 gallons of an extremely deadly poison
dumped into the river.
Another way to view or imagine this event, would be to take
8 of those 19,000 gallon tanker cars "full of raid" and
then dump them off the bridge!
This shit was so bad, it was reported by some of the first
responders that the beautiful rainbow trout were
jumping out of the water, onto the banks trying to escape
the angel of death that was invading their habitat.
This story is so deep, that in the future I intend to write a more
in depth account entitled "QUAKE AT CANTARRA".
It was at around this time the "frivolous lawsuit" controversy
was in it's infancy, but even then it was a very hot topic in California.
California, Oh California,
what a ravenous monster you are!
Fed daily by your corporate suitors,
you are their shining star.
Back to the "Cantarra Spill" as it was called.
Why yes of course a lawsuit was filed and a massive one at that,
with over 3,000 personal injury plaintiffs that would become
"class plaintiffs" in what I was told was the first major
"personal injury class action" law suit for California.
If this wasn't enough, there was a "business class" added
and then a "evacuation class" and finally
a "property owner class".
Four (4) major classes all stemming from one action.
This was definitely a first for California.
I must also mention the State of California also filed
"their own" suit against Southern Pacific.
After only 3 years of battle in court,
the "four classes" simultaneously settled!
These were mainly the people of: Mt. Shasta City, Dunsmuir,
Castella and Lakehead; the same people who lived, worked,
played, had businesses and raised their children in and around
these affected areas.
$15 million was the final settlement figure.
After deducting the
MANY Law firms take of about $6 million,
thereby
leaving the people the balance of about $9 million;
Remember, these are the ones who:
actually breathed for days the poisonous fumes and got sick,
the ones who in some cases unexpectedly lost loved ones,
the ones who lost their businesses,
the ones who were called "guinea pigs".
(cause no one knew the future effects of the chemical exposure)
The State of California:
also settled "their suit" against SP for the grand total of:
not 10, not 20, not 30 but $42 million!
That's $27 million more than those who were
directly and personally affected by the actual assault!
( actually the sum would be $33 million more if you
discounted the lawyers take!)
California, Oh California,
what a ravenous monster you are!
I am sure Siskiou County who stated publicly:
"they had a great working relationship with SP
and would not file suit" got" their fare share"!
Though there were some;
"implied criminal actions by SP noted",
no prosecution of the law was pursued.
Recently, I became aware of a new element
concerning The Cantarra Spill; one that implies that:
after "the initial incident of derailment",
SP "intentionally dropped" the hanging tanker car
into the river, with specific intention.
Of which I "shall not" state at this time,
however this needs be and shall be examined further.
Just for the record;
I always believed
"punitive damages" needed to be applied.
Just ask Judge Pollack!
Now back to the other track.
Though this law suit did not set a cap on the amount of award,
this example clearly illustrates:
"what is good for the goose
is not good for the gander"!
And "they" the states governments want to tell you and me
how much our lives are worth!
Just who do "these people" think they are anyway?
Really, who are "they"?
Well, they are: your friends, your neighbors, your family members;
"they" are those who work for the states and receive the many
benefits such as the great wages, the many vacation days with pay
and the great health insurance packages, etc.
"These" are quite simply and without becoming too derogatory,
"all government employees".
There actually is a "We" and a "They"!
Is it up to "We" to keep "They" in line,
or is it up to "They" to keep "We" in line,
or is it "Me" to keep "Me" in line and
just exactly where is the line anyway?
I don't seem to know do I?
But this I do know:
corporation can be four letter word- "CORP" and
it appears to me that The States seem to want to protect
the Corporations more than "We the people they serve",
yes I know
"The States" also serve the Corporations just needs,
but you get my point; don't you?
Or do you really?
If you take a closer look; The States
actually appear to work more like Corporations;
take, take, take and give as little as possible!
So what about the limits?
How about we limit
The States and Federal governments?
Oh no!
Don't even think about limiting these monsters appetites.
That is, unless we collectively get off our asses and
with unity, peacefully with our immensely strong voice
stand up against them.
I am FranCisco d' Nostromo
I have spoken
I will speak again.
It's your turn now!
To the reader, please go to "older posts" and begin with
#1. EVEPLEBEODIOUS. then sequentially #2., #3., etc.
#31. MONSTERS FEAST & CANTARRA
The states now receive huge sums of revenue from tax on
cigarettes, cigars, chew, smokeless tobacco, liquor, wine and beer.
Now is an understatement!
They, the states governments have been gleaning billions of dollars from
these taxes and stuffing this cash into their many bottomless pit pockets for
over 70 years!
If this is not enough, which it apparently isn't, now these
same states that have sucked the blood of the people through
and by this tax mechanism, are now attempting, and in some
cases have already been quite successful, in suing the tobacco industry
for a bigger slice of this bitter sweet money pie;
while I might add they still continue to receive the tax on
these "alleged killers"!
The question might be asked; just what do "they", the states,
do with this money?
Did "they" use this tax windfall to produce:
anti-smoking advertisements and educational forums?
I don't think so.
It seems the anti-smoking advertisements and educational
productions began "after " they " the states started winning
the suits against "their sugar daddy" tobacco companies!
In either aspect it all appears a little HYPOCRITICAL.
Maybe it's just me and my mis-understanding.
The states main claim against the tobacco industry is:
HEALTH CARE COSTS.
The states say , they have to "cough up" (no pun intended) the
payment for lung cancer and related illness born through
smoking and chewing tobacco products.
Please don't get me wrong; I AM NOT PRO-TOBACCO!
Although I know smoking tobacco products is absolutely a killer;
it is not the tobacco at fault, it is those who smoke and those
who support, promote and ALL who profit from tobacco.
Of course we all know it is "tobacco companies",
"their share holders" and "their employees" who reap
the most profit and thus should also be awarded special fault;
and yes of course because of any deception, the
special awards should be squared.
Let us not forget the health care industry in general!
Oops I amolst forgot; The Mortuaries and the Cemetaries!
As it is said, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that
applying heat to something designed to cool will ultimately cause
failure to some degree. Now add many destructive chemicals to
the mix and what do you get; total failure.
It just seems to be, on the part of the states, such a great farce!
How can the states justify their actions?
Shouldn't the states, since they have a share in the profits,
also claim
"their share" of the responsibility and the guilt?
But NO; instead the states claim "they" have been fouled!
Imagine that!
Also, these same states are trying to limit the amount of monies
to those who have been adversely affected through either
illicit or improper activities such as, fraud or malpractice.
The "Frivolous Law Suit" controversy is a hot topic these days
with many Law makers and Lobbyists.
Those who have been or might become injured by corporations,
doctors, hospitals and the like, are being told:
If you are injured, even if those that harmed you,
the defendants; get the asses severely kicked in court;
We, "the states" shall determine the "cap limit" you
may be awarded and that's that; and
even if you lost both of your arms because of your
"unfortunate experience" because of a faulty product
the answer is:
NO; "WE" won't come and help you wipe your ass and
Oh by the way, you just bought a pack of cigarettes,
thanks for paying your our tax!
"OUR" social system has become quite beastly;
no matter how many "time outs" we take.
Those that terribly injure others will have to pay a
minimal responsibility tab for "their so called errors",
no matter how much suffering those who were injured
shall have to endure!
Who stands to gain most from a system operated in this fashion?
Now switching tracks but still the same destination.
Northern California, July 14th, 1991 / You might recall;
Southern Pacific Railroad dropped a tanker car full to brim,
with 19,000 gallons of a bio-cide called
Metam Sodium (Vapam),
into an uppermost part of The Upper Sacramento River,
at a loop bridge called Cantarra;
consequently killing 45 miles of the river.
Everything in the river, plant or animal died. The plant life along
the river and the animal life that drank from the river died;
birds, bears, deer, squirrels, etc, died.
Even insects and earthworms died and disappeared as a result of
the huge cloud of toxic fumes created from the
8 gallons of water /1 gallon of chemical (poison) mix ratio.
Lets do the math: 8 x 19,000=152,000
That's 152,000 gallons of an extremely deadly poison
dumped into the river.
Another way to view or imagine this event, would be to take
8 of those 19,000 gallon tanker cars "full of raid" and
then dump them off the bridge!
This shit was so bad, it was reported by some of the first
responders that the beautiful rainbow trout were
jumping out of the water, onto the banks trying to escape
the angel of death that was invading their habitat.
This story is so deep, that in the future I intend to write a more
in depth account entitled "QUAKE AT CANTARRA".
It was at around this time the "frivolous lawsuit" controversy
was in it's infancy, but even then it was a very hot topic in California.
California, Oh California,
what a ravenous monster you are!
Fed daily by your corporate suitors,
you are their shining star.
Back to the "Cantarra Spill" as it was called.
Why yes of course a lawsuit was filed and a massive one at that,
with over 3,000 personal injury plaintiffs that would become
"class plaintiffs" in what I was told was the first major
"personal injury class action" law suit for California.
If this wasn't enough, there was a "business class" added
and then a "evacuation class" and finally
a "property owner class".
Four (4) major classes all stemming from one action.
This was definitely a first for California.
I must also mention the State of California also filed
"their own" suit against Southern Pacific.
After only 3 years of battle in court,
the "four classes" simultaneously settled!
These were mainly the people of: Mt. Shasta City, Dunsmuir,
Castella and Lakehead; the same people who lived, worked,
played, had businesses and raised their children in and around
these affected areas.
$15 million was the final settlement figure.
After deducting the
MANY Law firms take of about $6 million,
thereby
leaving the people the balance of about $9 million;
Remember, these are the ones who:
actually breathed for days the poisonous fumes and got sick,
the ones who in some cases unexpectedly lost loved ones,
the ones who lost their businesses,
the ones who were called "guinea pigs".
(cause no one knew the future effects of the chemical exposure)
The State of California:
also settled "their suit" against SP for the grand total of:
not 10, not 20, not 30 but $42 million!
That's $27 million more than those who were
directly and personally affected by the actual assault!
( actually the sum would be $33 million more if you
discounted the lawyers take!)
California, Oh California,
what a ravenous monster you are!
I am sure Siskiou County who stated publicly:
"they had a great working relationship with SP
and would not file suit" got" their fare share"!
Though there were some;
"implied criminal actions by SP noted",
no prosecution of the law was pursued.
Recently, I became aware of a new element
concerning The Cantarra Spill; one that implies that:
after "the initial incident of derailment",
SP "intentionally dropped" the hanging tanker car
into the river, with specific intention.
Of which I "shall not" state at this time,
however this needs be and shall be examined further.
Just for the record;
I always believed
"punitive damages" needed to be applied.
Just ask Judge Pollack!
Now back to the other track.
Though this law suit did not set a cap on the amount of award,
this example clearly illustrates:
"what is good for the goose
is not good for the gander"!
And "they" the states governments want to tell you and me
how much our lives are worth!
Just who do "these people" think they are anyway?
Really, who are "they"?
Well, they are: your friends, your neighbors, your family members;
"they" are those who work for the states and receive the many
benefits such as the great wages, the many vacation days with pay
and the great health insurance packages, etc.
"These" are quite simply and without becoming too derogatory,
"all government employees".
There actually is a "We" and a "They"!
Is it up to "We" to keep "They" in line,
or is it up to "They" to keep "We" in line,
or is it "Me" to keep "Me" in line and
just exactly where is the line anyway?
I don't seem to know do I?
But this I do know:
corporation can be four letter word- "CORP" and
it appears to me that The States seem to want to protect
the Corporations more than "We the people they serve",
yes I know
"The States" also serve the Corporations just needs,
but you get my point; don't you?
Or do you really?
If you take a closer look; The States
actually appear to work more like Corporations;
take, take, take and give as little as possible!
So what about the limits?
How about we limit
The States and Federal governments?
Oh no!
Don't even think about limiting these monsters appetites.
That is, unless we collectively get off our asses and
with unity, peacefully with our immensely strong voice
stand up against them.
I am FranCisco d' Nostromo
I have spoken
I will speak again.
It's your turn now!
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
#30. "EVENT 91101"/ WHY RIDGE?
To the reader,
please go to "older blogs" and begin with
#1. EVEPLEBEODIOUS, then sequentially #2., #3., etc.
#30. "EVENT 91101"/ WHY RIDGE?
Why is it, the former governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Ridge, was
chosen to be "the" director of Homeland Security?
Remember, this was an office that did not actually exist until very
shortly after "Event 91101", THE PRESIDENT, George W. Bush
created or, brought forth to light this "new" agency!
The question arises; "was this agency planned before Event 91101"?
At that time, in essence, President Bush said to
"the people of Pennsylvania":
Tom Ridge, is now "not" the Governor of Pennsylvania;
Tom Ridge is now The Director of Homeland Security!
Who gave permission to the President to create a new office?
How is a new office of the United States created?
Does one "speak the word" and "it is"; or does one suggest,
propose, or offer the idea of a new office to Congress and
the American people?
Tom Ridge was the presiding Governor of Pennsylvania,
specifically chosen by "the people of Pennsylvania",
for "the people and purpose of Pennsylvania"a separate State!
How is it a President can "over ride" the voice of the people?
The people of Pennsylvania "did not" elect the Lt. Governor to
be "The Governor"; they "the people" chose Tom Ridge!
They "the people", basically had "their choice" stolen
away from them!
Oh yes of course the job was "offered" to Tom Ridge and "HE"
took it; and yes "HE" could have denied the position but
he did not and consequently, left "the people" who chose "him"
to run and hopefully prosper "their state" shaking their heads.
It seems to me , if a person runs for "a office" and is elected to
that office by the "will of the people"; then that person shall
stay in that office until either:
they are legally removed from the office by "the people" for
a crime against "the people or the States Constitution",
or "proved incompetence",
or they suffer from ill health and cannot maintain the office,
or they outright resign the office because "they" do not want
the "job responsibility" any longer. PERIOD
"They" should not ; be able to leave "their position" or "post" to
take "any other government position, again PERIOD.
"They", who were "elected" should be "made to follow through"
with their commitment to the people who elected them!
Consider this; much of tax payer time and monies were spent on
the election process and lest we be called "unfair", let us
not forget to mention the "other candidates" who also wanted
the position, but could not have the position, because "they"
were bested by the winning candidate, who now decides "they" no
longer want the position because of "greener pastures" or
"what ever" and leaves!
Perhaps "the losing candidate(s)" might actually have been
"the winning candidate" if the candidate "who actually won",
had not even run, cause "they" decided "they" really didn't want
the job in the first place.
Such is politics right......or maybe a well thought out and
deliberate "political chess move"....quite possibly a great way to
progress a much greater hidden agenda!
Back to the questions;
Why Tom Ridge?
Why a presiding governor?
Why not someone else, someone else "not already obligated"?
Why choose Tom Ridge to oversee not just a security office but
a security office of "major concerns", when Tom Ridge had little
or NO experience in security?
Why Tom Ridge?
Why the presiding Governor of Pennsylvania?
It is a little ironic, that "Flight 93" went down in Pennsylvania,
that's right Pennsylvania and "yes" there is and has been major
questions and controversy concerning "how", "why" and even "if"
the plane fell from the sky.
Why Tom Ridge?
Today March 2nd, 2004, is the second anniversary of the
installation of "The Office Of Homeland Security".
Today President Bush stated the reason he chose Tom Ridge was;
"Tom Ridge had management and assessment abilities".
Like no other person in this country had management and
assessment abilities!
Like no other person in this country could have performed
this task.
I wonder; do you?
I hope so!
Obviously this script was written 5 years ago and yes;
I still wonder!
Now 5 years later, It is President Obama who is asking presiding
Governors to give up State Seats, to take up Federal Seats.
I am FranCisco d Nostromo
I have spoken and I will speak again.
It's your turn now!
To the reader,
please go to "older blogs" and begin with
#1. EVEPLEBEODIOUS, then sequentially #2., #3., etc.
#30. "EVENT 91101"/ WHY RIDGE?
Why is it, the former governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Ridge, was
chosen to be "the" director of Homeland Security?
Remember, this was an office that did not actually exist until very
shortly after "Event 91101", THE PRESIDENT, George W. Bush
created or, brought forth to light this "new" agency!
The question arises; "was this agency planned before Event 91101"?
At that time, in essence, President Bush said to
"the people of Pennsylvania":
Tom Ridge, is now "not" the Governor of Pennsylvania;
Tom Ridge is now The Director of Homeland Security!
Who gave permission to the President to create a new office?
How is a new office of the United States created?
Does one "speak the word" and "it is"; or does one suggest,
propose, or offer the idea of a new office to Congress and
the American people?
Tom Ridge was the presiding Governor of Pennsylvania,
specifically chosen by "the people of Pennsylvania",
for "the people and purpose of Pennsylvania"a separate State!
How is it a President can "over ride" the voice of the people?
The people of Pennsylvania "did not" elect the Lt. Governor to
be "The Governor"; they "the people" chose Tom Ridge!
They "the people", basically had "their choice" stolen
away from them!
Oh yes of course the job was "offered" to Tom Ridge and "HE"
took it; and yes "HE" could have denied the position but
he did not and consequently, left "the people" who chose "him"
to run and hopefully prosper "their state" shaking their heads.
It seems to me , if a person runs for "a office" and is elected to
that office by the "will of the people"; then that person shall
stay in that office until either:
they are legally removed from the office by "the people" for
a crime against "the people or the States Constitution",
or "proved incompetence",
or they suffer from ill health and cannot maintain the office,
or they outright resign the office because "they" do not want
the "job responsibility" any longer. PERIOD
"They" should not ; be able to leave "their position" or "post" to
take "any other government position, again PERIOD.
"They", who were "elected" should be "made to follow through"
with their commitment to the people who elected them!
Consider this; much of tax payer time and monies were spent on
the election process and lest we be called "unfair", let us
not forget to mention the "other candidates" who also wanted
the position, but could not have the position, because "they"
were bested by the winning candidate, who now decides "they" no
longer want the position because of "greener pastures" or
"what ever" and leaves!
Perhaps "the losing candidate(s)" might actually have been
"the winning candidate" if the candidate "who actually won",
had not even run, cause "they" decided "they" really didn't want
the job in the first place.
Such is politics right......or maybe a well thought out and
deliberate "political chess move"....quite possibly a great way to
progress a much greater hidden agenda!
Back to the questions;
Why Tom Ridge?
Why a presiding governor?
Why not someone else, someone else "not already obligated"?
Why choose Tom Ridge to oversee not just a security office but
a security office of "major concerns", when Tom Ridge had little
or NO experience in security?
Why Tom Ridge?
Why the presiding Governor of Pennsylvania?
It is a little ironic, that "Flight 93" went down in Pennsylvania,
that's right Pennsylvania and "yes" there is and has been major
questions and controversy concerning "how", "why" and even "if"
the plane fell from the sky.
Why Tom Ridge?
Today March 2nd, 2004, is the second anniversary of the
installation of "The Office Of Homeland Security".
Today President Bush stated the reason he chose Tom Ridge was;
"Tom Ridge had management and assessment abilities".
Like no other person in this country had management and
assessment abilities!
Like no other person in this country could have performed
this task.
I wonder; do you?
I hope so!
Obviously this script was written 5 years ago and yes;
I still wonder!
Now 5 years later, It is President Obama who is asking presiding
Governors to give up State Seats, to take up Federal Seats.
I am FranCisco d Nostromo
I have spoken and I will speak again.
It's your turn now!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
